Wednesday, April 24, 2019

Avian Cnemial Crest

Birds have several mechanisms for aquatic locomotion. Two types of propulsion are employed by divers, this by use of their wings or legs. Underwater use of wings is seen in species such as penguins and auks, whereas foot-propulsion is utilized by loons, grebes and some waterfowl. 


Suggestions of an aquatic lifestyle are often noted in a bird’s skeletal features, especially when fossil interpretation is concerned. 

An Early Cretaceous taxon for which a more aquatic lifestyle is strongly established is in Gansus yumenensis, from the lacustrine deposits of the Xiagou Formation in Gansu Province in China (source: Mayr G. Avian Evolution. 2017).

Gansus is commonly mentioned to possess long feet, which were used aptly for hindlimb propulsion. But the strongest evidence for this type of aquatic behavior may lie in the elongated cnemial crest of the tibiotarsus.

The cnemial crest is a crest-like prominence located at the front side of the head of the tibiotarsus or tibia in the legs of birds and other dinosaurs.

Avian Cnemial Crest Diagram
From Manual of Ornithology, N.S. Proctor 1993.
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
The crest is most highly developed in the loons and grebes in which it partly encircles the knee joint (Source: Avian Osteology). The greatly elongated cnemial crest serves to enlarge the insertion sites of the hypertrophied leg muscles (source: Mayr G. Avian Evolution. 2017). The main extensor muscle of the thigh is attached to this ridge.

Cnemial crest of an extant loon.
From; Mayr G Avian Evolution. 2017
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Surprisingly, the evolutionary relationship between loons, grebes and fossil birds is often found, and better understood, within the development of the crest itself. 

Paleontologist Sankar Chatterjee explains this in his 2006 paper; The Morphology and Systematics of Polarornis, a Cretaceous Loon (Aves: Gaviidae) from Antarctica.  

“The long cnemial crest of Polarornis clearly indicates its foot-propelled diving adaptation. Although Polarornis superficially resemble grebes and hesperornithiforms in the mechanical design of the hindlimbs, the way in which the cnemial crest is developed among different foot-propelled diving birds may be an important phylogenetic character. The cnemial crest of the loon is derived solely from the tibiotarsus, but the patella is lacking. In Hesperornis, the cnemial crest evolved from the development and expansion of the patella. In grebes, on the other hand, both patella and tibiotarsus contribute to the formation of the cnemial crest. If these diving birds were closely related, it is unlikely that the formation of this structure would have evolved along such a very different pathway. It is likely that loons, grebes, and hesperornithiform birds are purely convergent in their adaptations and did not share a common ancestry.”

Morphological variations of cnemial crest among diving birds. 
From; The Morphology and Systematics of Polarornis. Chatterjee, 2006
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/ 
Name: Extensor digitorum longus. Origin: Anterior surface of the proximal tibiotarsus. Insertion: Distal phalanges of the digits. Action: Extends the digits.
Proctor, N.S. (1993) Manual of Ornithology: Avian Structure and Function. (See below)


Avian cnemial crest 
From Proctor N.S. (1993) Manual of Ornithology
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/


Avian extensor digitorum longus muscle 
From Proctor N.S. (1993) Manual of Ornithology
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/

Friday, April 12, 2019

Avian Pachyostotic Bones; seeking a clear definition.

The gap between amateur and professional ornithologist is often painfully apparent to me, especially when wording is concerned.

This was the situation the other evening while I was reading Gerald Mayr’s 2017 book, Avian Evolution; The Fossil Record of Birds and its Paleo-biological Significance. In it, I came upon a peculiar word that I never saw, or heard of before.

Mayr starts by writing that the foot-propelled hesperornithiforms were highly specialized diving birds and mainly occurred in the northern latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, most of which were flightless and lived in marine environments. 


Hesperornis regalis
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Within hesperornithiforms a large size was gained several times independently, and in particular some species, like the Late Cretaceous Hesperornis were very large, reaching a length of 1.5 meters.

As an adaptation for their diving habits, the limb bones of hesperornithiforms are pachyostotic; that is, they have very thick bone walls. Pachyostotic bones also occur in other flightless diving birds, such as penguins, and reduce buoyancy by increasing the weight of the bird (source: Mayr, G. 2017 Avian Evolution). 

Pachyostotic, or Pachyostosis, is further described as a non-pathological condition in vertebrate animals in which the bones experience a thickening, generally caused by extra layers of lamellar bone. It often occurs together with bone densification (osteosclerosis), reducing inner cavities. This joint occurrence is called pachyosteosclerosis. However, especially in the older literature, "pachyostosis" is often used loosely, referring to all osseous specializations characterized by an increase in bone compactness and/or volume (source: Wikipedia).

Removed from the definition of Pachyostosis are two related words, including osteosclerosis and pachyosteosclerosis.

Frustrated, I decided to look deeper into other researcher’s scientific work, and see how they used and defined these terms regarding high bone compactness.

One paper I found titled; Osteosclerosis in the Extinct Cayaoa bruneti (Aves, Anseriformes): Insights on Behavior and Flightlessness (De Mendoza and Tambussi 2015), provided a slightly different description of bone histology in extant and extinct birds.    

De Mendoza and Tambussi write;

“There is a strong association between bone micro-anatomy and lifestyle. In general terms, divers have skeletons with greater bone density due to a thickening of the cortex by higher deposition of periosteal bone which is known as pachyostosis. There may be also a reduction in the medullary resorption, a process called osteosclerosis. Both of these processes may occur in combination.”

“Among wing-propelled divers, several studies showed that penguins have highly osteosclerotic limbs (Ksepka, 2007; Meister, 1962; Cerda et al., 2014). Such high osteosclerosis levels were also verified in foot-propelled divers such as the Cretaceous flightless bird Hesperornis (Marsh, 1872) and the Antarctic Cretaceous loon Polarornis gregorii (Chatterjee, 2002).” 

Even more uncertain was information provided in the 2015 paper, Bone Histology in Extant and Fossil Penguins (Aves: Sphenisciformes), by Daniel T Ksepka. He writes; High bone density in penguins results from compaction of the internal cortical tissues, and thus penguin bones are best considered osteosclerotic rather than pachyostotic.

The author also mentions that penguin limb bones differ from those of nearly all other birds in their greater bone density, near complete lack of pneumatization, unusually thick periosteum and greatly reduced medullary cavities. 


Bone Regions
Image Property: www.apsubiology.org
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Thick periosteum and greatly reduced medullary cavities? To the average reader like myself, the last sentence sounds a bit ambivalent, but Ksepka goes on to elaborate by stating;

“The bone structure of penguins has been variably referred to as pachyostotic (Meister, 1962; Mayr, 2005; Ksepka et al. 2006; Livezey & Zusi, 2006), osteosclerotic (de Ricqlès & de Buffrénil, 2001; Ksepka et al. 2008; Cerda et al. 2015) or pachyosteoscleortic (Houssaye, 2009). The term pachyostotic does not apply to penguins, because they do not exhibit periosteal hyperplasy: the external dimensions of the hind limb bones of penguins remain unexpanded, with hind limb bone cross-sectional area remaining within the range observed in similarly sized volant birds (DTK personal observation). Comparisons of the external dimensions of wing bones between penguins and volant birds are more difficult due to the highly flattened and shortened morphology of the penguin flipper. However, Meister (1962) demonstrated that the extremely high bone density of the penguin humerus is achieved solely through compaction of the internal tissues, without expansion of the external circumferential layer. This finding was further supported by observations from an ontogenetic series of Aptenodytes patagonicus specimens by Canoville (2010). Thus, the term ‘osteosclerotic’ is more accurately applied to penguin limb bones (de Ricqlès & de Buffrénil, 2001).”

It is also important to point out why this condition is important to certain bird species. Ksepka continues;

“Dense bone commonly has been interpreted as a means of reducing buoyancy and thus conserving energy during diving (e.g. Nopcsa, 1923; Wall, 1983; Lovvorn et al. 1999). Additionally, increased thickness of the limb bone cortices can enhance resistance to bending or torsional loads, which are substantially higher in wing-propelled diving relative to most conditions encountered during aerial flight (Habib & Ruff, 2008). Because extant penguin wing bones exhibit cortical thickness far above that required for bending resistance alone, it is plausible that this increase in thickness serves both to increase ballast and to increase resistance (Habib, 2010).”

Below is a comparison in weight of two similar sized bones; the humerus of a Miocene Banded Penguin (Spheniscus urbinai), the other of a Pleistocene Wild Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Despite the penguin bones smaller dimensions, its weight is nearly double that of the turkeys. 


Banded Penguin and Wild Turkey Humerus
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Banded Penguin Humerus Weight in Grams
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Wild Turkey Humerus Weight in Grams
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

Avian Inspired Poems. The Cedar-Bird (Cedar Waxwing).

Avian Inspired Poems. The Cedar-Bird (Cedar Waxwing).

Inspired by such works as Land-Birds and Game-Birds of New England by H.D. Minot (1877) and The Birds of New England by Edward A. Samuels (1870), is my attempt to bring their long-forgotten words, and place in time, back to life through a series of short poems and images. 

The Birds of New England by Edward A. Samuels (1870)
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/

Common name in 1877:   The Cedar-Bird

Common name in 2019:   Cedar Waxwing, (Bombycilla cedrorum)

1938 Arm & Hammer Useful Birds of America Series
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/

The Cedar-Bird

Footpaths lined with ornamentals, don their mellow fruits. 

The Cedar-Bird is not a songster, in silence they often loot.

Social are these olive birds, they feast and have their fill.

Returning to the biting sky, with grace and much free will.

Cedar Waxwing (Bombycilla cedorum) 
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Cedar Waxwing (Bombycilla cedorum)
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/

Friday, April 5, 2019

Great Blue Heron (Ardea Herodias) Rookery

Here are a couple images from last evening at a local Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias) rookery.

Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias) building nest
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
 https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/

Great Blue Herons nest communally in "rookeries" or "heronries" containing up to 50 pair. Herons typically use the same rookery every year until eventually the trees collapse.

Great Blue Heron (Ardea Herodias) building nest
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Great Blue Heron (Ardea Herodias) nest
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/

The nests are flat platforms made of sticks and lined with moss, pine needles, and other leaf material. The nests are added to each year, eventually becoming very bulky and measuring up to four feet in diameter.

Source: www.massaudubon.org

Wednesday, April 3, 2019

Effects of the increased Use and Disuse of Parts, as controlled by Natural Selection. Avian Darwin.

Effects of the increased Use and Disuse of Parts, as controlled by Natural Selection. Avian Darwin. 


Passage;

“From the facts alluded to in the first chapter, I think there can be no doubt that use in our domestic animals has strengthened and enlarged certain parts, and disuse diminished them; and that such modifications are inherited. Under free nature, we have no standard of comparison, by which to judge of the effects, of long-continued use or disuse, for we know not the parent-forms; but many animals possess structures which can be best explained by the effects of disuse. As Professor Owen has remarked, there is no greater anomaly in nature than a bird that cannot fly; yet there are several in this state. The logger-headed duck of South America can only flap along the surface of the water, and has its wings in nearly the same condition as the domestic Aylesbury duck: it is a remarkable fact that the young birds, according to Mr. Cunningham, can fly, while the adults have lost this power. As the larger ground-feeding birds seldom take flight except to escape danger, it is probable that the nearly wingless condition of several birds, now inhabiting or which lately inhabited several oceanic islands, tenanted by no beast of prey, has been caused by disuse. The ostrich indeed inhabits continents, and is exposed to danger from which it cannot escape by flight, but it can defend itself by kicking its enemies, as efficiently as many quadrupeds. We may believe that the progenitor of the ostrich genus had habits like those of the bustard, and that, as the size and weight of its body were increased during successive generations, its legs were used more, and its wings less, until they became incapable of flight” 

Logger-headed Duck (Tachyeres brachypterus) aka Falkland Steamer Duck
Image Property of: Wikipedia
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/

Charles Darwin

Origin of Species; 1873.

Chapter 6, page 108, Effects of the increased Use and Disuse of Parts, as controlled by Natural Selection.

First edition in which Darwin uses the word evolution. This was also the last edition published during Darwin's lifetime.

Sunday, March 31, 2019

Bird Photography with a Nikon Coolpix P1000

I took my new camera out today for its first ever test drive; a Nikon Coolpix P1000 which features a 3000mm super telephoto lens.

Nikon Coolpix P1000
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/

Imagine being able to zoom far beyond the reach of standard telephoto lenses, to capture not just the moon, but the craters, peaks and valleys of its surface. Imagine being able to view the International Space Station in flight, even the rings of Saturn—not with a telescope, but with a one-of-a-kind Nikon camera. Introducing the COOLPIX P1000, the most extreme zoom Nikon ever, and a game-changer for birders, sports and wildlife enthusiasts, travel photographers and even those aspiring to venture to the moon and beyond without leaving their backyard (Source: nikonusa.com).

Featured birds include Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia), Northern Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), Northern Flicker (Colaptes auratus), American Robin (Turdus migratorius), Tufted Titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor), Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater), Dark-eyed Junco (Junco hyemalis) and Black-capped Chickadee (Poecile atricapillus).

Photographs taken in Connecticut, USA under overcast conditions; temperatures at 52 degrees Fahrenheit (12 degrees Celsius).

Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia)
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Northern Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos)
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Northern Flicker (Colaptes auratus)
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
American Robin (Turdus migratorius)
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Tufted Titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor)
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis)
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater)
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Dark-eyed Junco (Junco hyemalis) 
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Black-capped Chickadee (Poecile atricapillus)
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, March 26, 2019

Avian Drop Foraging; a precursor to powered flight?

In recent years, increasing numbers of tourists have ventured to the New World tropics in search of exotic birds. Many, if not most of these people expect to find symbolic species such as trogons, tanagers, toucans and parrots.

Others, like myself, travel to the tropics with the hopes of adding knowledge about bird ecology and evolution, in this the richest of environments.

Of course, seeing cotinga’s and puffbirds for the first time is always an exhilarating and memorable experience. Some memories however are more vivid to me than others, including one that I experienced many years ago in a lush and humid Panamanian rainforest.

It was on an early morning walk down a beautiful forest trail, where I happened upon a rarely seen Great Tinamou (Tinamus major), searching for fallen fruits and seeds. Clearly surprised by our encounter, the bird quickly scurried off into the underbrush and out of sight.

As I continued my search for the tinamou in the dense undergrowth, my eyes were suddenly drawn to a Northern Barred Woodcreeper (Dendrocolaptes sanctithomae) perched motionless on a rotting log. Located directly next to the woodcreeper was an Ocellated Antbird (Phaenostictus mcleannani), also motionless. I thought to myself; what has drawn the attention of these two species?

Curious, I began to scan the surrounding area very carefully, until I came upon an active army ant colony. Initially, it was assumed that the woodcreeper and antbird were simply eating the ants. But as I continued to watch their behavior, I began to realize that that the birds were not feeding on the ants at all, but rather on the insects flushed by the swarming army ants. As a newcomer to tropical birding, their unusual behavior was beginning to make more sense.

Ant followers, as the woodcreeper and antbird are typically known, are birds that feed by following swarms of army ants (Eciton burchellii) and take prey flushed by those ants. The best-known ant-followers are 18 species of antbird in the family Thamnophilidae, but other families of birds may follow ants including thrushes, chats, ant-tanagers, cuckoos, and woodcreepers (source: Wikipedia).

Of particular interest to me was the exotically colorful antbird. In addition to its unique plumage and large area of blue facial skin, the Ocellated Antbird also takes part in an unusual method of hunting.   

Often referred to as drop-foraging, Ocellated Antbirds normally perch on stems and small tree trunks within one meter of the ground, sallying down to capture potential prey. Ocellated Antbirds are particularly adept at clinging to thin, vertical stems, with strong legs and toes. 

Ocellated Antbird (Phaenostictus mcleanni)
Image Property of: neotropical.birds.cornell.edu; Donald Kirker
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Drop-foraging offers birds numerous benefits. In the case of the antbird, it allows for close approach and close inspection of army ant colonies, giving it a leg up (literally!) on the competition. It also helps the birds avoid becoming overrun, or stung by the swarming ants.

Closer to home, I see the same type of behavior in our neighborhood Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis).

Research shows that drop-foraging constitutes the method of almost 100% of foraging attempts during the early breeding season. During the height of breeding season, 80% of bluebird foraging attempts are perch-to-ground movements. Hovering is uncommon. Younger fledglings hop along the ground to forage before acquiring adult drop-foraging habits (source: Bird of North America online).

Eastern Bluebird (Sialia sialis) Drop Foraging
Image Credit: Evan Hambrick
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/

The benefits of this technique are similar to the antbirds, allowing the bluebird to scan a wider area for insects, while remaining at a reasonable striking distance. This is in direct contrast to other local species like the American Robin (Turdus migratorius) and Common Grackle (Quiscalus quiscula), who expend a great deal more energy on foot during hunting forays.

Clinging low to elevated stems and tree trunks also permits the birds to search their surroundings for potential predators.

So, how did this type of hunting method evolve? Is this behavior more of a recent development? Or are there any clues in the fossil record that may increase our understanding of this behavior, helping us to possibly answer questions about the origin of flight.

In the 2015 book-The Rise of Birds; 225 Million Years of Evolution, author Sankar Chatterjee goes to great lengths discussing the three competing models for the origin of avian flight.

Two theories have dominated most of the debates, the cursorial ("from the ground up") theory proposes that birds evolved from small, fast predators that ran on the ground; the arboreal ("from the trees down") theory proposes that powered flight evolved from unpowered gliding by arboreal (tree-climbing) animals.

A more recent theory, "wing-assisted incline running" (WAIR), is a variant of the cursorial theory and proposes that wings developed their aerodynamic functions as a result of the need to run quickly up very steep slopes such as trees, which would help small feathered dinosaurs escape from predators (source: Wikipedia, Origin of Birds).

Origin of Flight; From Rise of Birds, Chatterjee 2015
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
In short, Chatterjee clearly favor a “trees down” scenario, where the evolution of flight (and advanced feather development) happens solely in the trees, in a sequence of progression from climbing to jumping to parachuting to biplane gliding to monoplane gliding, soaring, flapping to complex maneuvering flight.

He downplays the cursorial theory by stating that it fails to explain fully why the primary vanes of Archaeopteryx are so asymmetrical and complex, a condition seen only in modern volant birds.

Chatterjee continues; If Archaeopteryx were a ground-dwelling bird, as John Ostrom depicted, it would have had hair-like feathers, like those of ostriches and rheas. The cursorial theory works against gravity and is energetically more expensive. The effects of gravity would create additional stress on proto-birds during takeoff. To overcome the added stress, the supracoracoideus pulley system would be required during takeoff; its lack in Archaeopteryx indicates that it took off from trees to become airborne, not from the ground.

The cursorial theory does not address the necessary transitional form between the preflight stage and the active, flapping flight stage; flight would thus have evolved rapidly, from jumping to active flying, almost by saltation without any intermediate gliding stage. This theory does not explain adequately the origin of feathers, endothermy, or brain enlargement and three-dimensional perceptual control (source: The Rise of Birds, Chatterjee, 2015).

But what if we factor in the evolutionary behavior of drop-foraging? Could this be the go-between behavior that the “ground up” theory is looking for?

Let us envision for a moment a small feathered coelurosaur, hunting in dense undergrowth. A distant crashing sound sends the dinosaur running to the nearest conifer (cycadeoids, etc.), where it uses its powerful legs to leap and grasp onto the tree’s rough trunk. It nervously scans the surroundings, at the same time periodically flapping one of its feathered arms to keep balanced, similar to a medium sized bird on a small tube-feeder.

Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata) on tube feeder
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
As the threat subsides, the hungry animal continues to search for prey. Once spotted, the dinosaur forcefully pushes off the trunk and into the air, flapping and gliding a short distance to the forest floor where it renews its pursuit.

For a ground-dwelling dinosaur in the earliest moments of avian evolution, there are a number of good reasons why it might have wanted to leap into the air, without feeling the need to stay there.

I see Archaeopteryx as a predominantly terrestrial predator, like today's Greater Roadrunner (Geococcyx californianus) who uses its feathered forelimbs and strong legs for leaping and rudimentary take-offs from ground level, to better access food and escaping predators.

Drop-foraging among small feathered coelurosaurs would involve vertical leaps from the ground, cling-perching on low stems and trees, balance-flapping, leaping again, controlled flapping and gliding descent; effectively explaining the origin of advanced feathers, brain enlargement and three-dimensional perceptual control, without the need of parachuting from great heights.

I could also imagine the early forms of enantiornithine and pygostylians birds utilizing this same foraging behavior, since all were most likely still tied to nesting and feeding upon the forest floor.  

Mesozoic Bird Drop Foraging
Image Property of: leaubellon.tumblr.com
Leaubellon
I often wondered if we could see any anatomical differences in the foot bones of antbirds, bluebirds or any other bark specialists, as a result of these unique actions. If so, how about in the fossil record.

White-breasted Nuthatch (Sitta carolinensis)
Image Property of: Stanislav Harvancik
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
As luck would have it, I remember years ago photographing a Chinese enantiornithine fossil with just that sort of anatomical anomaly.

Though it may have simply been an artifact of the preservation in the fossil, the ancient bird’s feet (foot) are a true eye-opener for the first-time observer!

Reminiscent of an aye-aye’s (Daubentonia madagascariensis) special thin middle finger, or Australian Striped Possum (Dactylopsila trivirgata) front forelimb, the fossil foot, at the slightest, may signal the start of a selected adaptation to dominant stem/trunk foot support. 

Enantiornithine Fossil Feet
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/
Enantiornithine Fossil Foot
Photo Credit: Paul Cianfaglione
https://avianmusing.blogspot.com/